The Meaninglessness of External Causes

well-nigh philosophers say that our life is meansless because it has a prescribed end. This is a opposed assertion: is a characterization rendered significationless because of its finitude? Some things acquire a meat precisely because they be exhaustible: consider academic studies, for instance. It would be that importeefulness does not enumerate upon matters temporary. We whole share the belief that we empathize significance from outside(a) sources. Something bigger than us - and outside us - bestows pith upon our lives: God, the State, a social institution, an historical cause. Yet, this belief is misplaced and mistaken. If much(prenominal) an foreign source of pith were to depend upon us for its translation (hence, for its import) - how could we derive meaning from it? A cyclical argument ensues. We dissolve neer derive meaning from that whose in truth meaning (or commentary) is dependent on us. The delimit cannot define the definer. To use the specify as quit of its deliver definition (by the vice of its inclusion in the definer) is the very definition of a tautology, the gravest of logical fallacies. On the different hand: if such an external source of meaning were non dependent on us for its definition or meaning - again it would study been of no use in our betoken for meaning and definition.

That which is perfectly self-reliant of us - is absolutely innocuous of any(prenominal) interaction with us because such an interaction would inevitably devote conventional a variance of its definition or meaning. And that, which is innocuous of any interaction with us - cannot be write outn to us. We know about(predicate) something by interacting with it. The very trade of information - through the senses - is an interaction. Thus, both we serve as agency of the definition or the meaning of an external... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.