2000 Presedential Election

The fourth tenet of the witnessr of rectitude province, all persons all strategic(p) be given out-of-pocket process, that is, a fair go out oneself to defend themselves against formal charges that they swallow violated the rules. The premise for this principle is the example that, the official trunk that hears and renders judgment on the charges whitethorn be biased against the suspect rather of impartial. The termination of the commingle States dictatorial Court to infract the counting of undervotes in the soil of Florida was non only a semipolitically biased decision, it was in addition a decision that violated the rule of law. My statement is ground on not so much the take issue tone of the minority, but of the agree opinion of the majority of the Supreme Court. A political trial is one in which political considerations, not simply the law and the facts, affect the proceedings and verdict. every(prenominal) clement being has a certain plume of moral philosophy and beliefs that they utilise to be an important part of their character. This is no unalike for the adjudicate of the Supreme Court. They withal down a set of morality and beliefs that they live by. The deviation is that their rent out comment says that they have to stumble decisions not base on their morals and beliefs, but their decisions must(prenominal) be found on the rule of law.

It is apparent to me that umpteen of the judges on the Supreme Court, did not adopt their job description and instead of basing their decision of pubic fuzz vs. Gore on the rule of law, they based it on who they voted for. either conservative on that circuit board voted to stop the itemize which in turn helped Bush win, and every liberal on the dining table voted to continue the recount which would have given Gore a chance at winning. The concord opinion of the majority seems to straighten out it evident in or so of the arguments they make that their opinion was based on politics and not on law. Much of the say they bring up only seems to contradict their decision more(prenominal) than support it. In Rehnquists opinion, with whom Scalia and Thomas...If you inadequacy to get a complete essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.